******************************************
These problems were inspired by Aaron Finch's great innings last night. Apologies that some knowledge of cricket is required.
In a Twenty20 match Australia bat first and score 261. England's openers are A and B, who are both remarkably consistent. A plays every ball he faces for 3, while B scores 2 off every ball he receives. In an equally unrealistic manner, the Australian bowlers never bowl no-balls.
So the openers score an average of 2.5 runs per ball, and therefore over 20 overs England will expect to score 300. But after how many balls will England win the match?
Second problem: Unfortunately England's top batsman, A, is unavailable for the next match and is replaced by C, who scores a single run off every ball he faces. Clearly a loss of two runs per ball will make a big difference to England's total score. How many fewer runs will they make off 20 overs when C, rather than A, opens the batting with B?
(Photo by Supun47 from Wikimedia Commons)
These questions were motivated by the observation that Finch faced more than his fair share of the bowling last night. So was luck a factor in his making such a high score? No, it wasn't, because a batsman who is scoring lots of boundaries will have much more of the strike than a batsman scoring in singles!
